Elbert Huang to Young Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elbert Huang has written about Young Adult.
Connection Strength
0.699
-
Cost-effectiveness of Shared Telemedicine Appointments in Young Adults With T1D: CoYoT1 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1589-1592.
Score: 0.066
-
Medicaid Eligibility Expansions May Address Gaps In Access To Diabetes Medications. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 08; 37(8):1200-1207.
Score: 0.062
-
Revisiting Disparities in Quality of Care Among US Adults With Diabetes in the Era of Individualized Care, NHANES 2007-2010. Med Care. 2015 Jan; 53(1):25-31.
Score: 0.049
-
Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care. Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct; 49(5):1498-518.
Score: 0.046
-
Public health implications of recommendations to individualize glycemic targets in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan; 36(1):84-9.
Score: 0.041
-
Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep; 12(9):679-84.
Score: 0.036
-
The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun; 33(6):1269-74.
Score: 0.035
-
The association between the number of prescription medications and incident falls in a multi-ethnic population of adult type-2 diabetes patients: the diabetes and aging study. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb; 25(2):141-6.
Score: 0.034
-
Pancreatic cystic lesions: clinical predictors of malignancy in patients undergoing surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15; 31(2):285-94.
Score: 0.034
-
Racial/ethnic differences in concerns about current and future medications among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb; 32(2):311-6.
Score: 0.032
-
The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec; 23(12):2058-65.
Score: 0.032
-
Lifetime Health Effects and Cost-Effectiveness of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in US Adults. JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Mar 07; 6(3):e245586.
Score: 0.025
-
Male Gender Expressivity and Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease Risks in Men. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2441281.
Score: 0.024
-
The landmark JDRF continuous glucose monitoring randomized trials: a look back at the accumulated evidence. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug; 5(4):380-7.
Score: 0.020
-
Building and experimenting with an agent-based model to study the population-level impact of CommunityRx, a clinic-based community resource referral intervention. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 10; 17(10):e1009471.
Score: 0.020
-
Cost and healthcare utilization analysis of culturally sensitive, shared medical appointment model for Latino children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 08; 22(5):816-822.
Score: 0.019
-
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar; 13(3):351-8.
Score: 0.019
-
Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):586-90.
Score: 0.019
-
Provider and Staff Morale, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout over a 4-Year Medical Home Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 06; 34(6):952-959.
Score: 0.016
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Screening Between Asian Americans and Other Adults: BRFSS 2012-2014. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr; 32(4):423-429.
Score: 0.014
-
Diabetes and cardiovascular disease in older adults: current status and future directions. Diabetes. 2014 Aug; 63(8):2578-89.
Score: 0.012
-
Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Sep; 28(9):1118-22.
Score: 0.010
-
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human osteosarcoma. Oncogene. 2011 Sep 15; 30(37):3907-17.
Score: 0.009
-
Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):540-4.
Score: 0.009
-
Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct; 33(10):2175-7.
Score: 0.009
-
The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug; 32(8):1378-83.
Score: 0.008