The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Harriet De Wit to Central Nervous System Stimulants

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Harriet De Wit has written about Central Nervous System Stimulants.
Harriet De Wit
Connection Strength
15.860
Central Nervous System Stimulants
  1. Neural correlates of inhibitory control are associated with stimulant-like effects of alcohol. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 07; 46(8):1442-1450.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.623
  2. Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 05; 204:173158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.615
  3. Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 07 01; 212:107989.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.580
  4. Poor inhibitory control is associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Mar; 237(3):825-832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.565
  5. Subjective responses to amphetamine in young adults with previous mood elevation experiences. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Nov; 236(11):3363-3370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.547
  6. Methamphetamine acutely alters frontostriatal resting state functional connectivity in healthy young adults. Addict Biol. 2020 05; 25(3):e12775.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  7. Effects of methamphetamine on neural responses to visual stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Jun; 236(6):1741-1748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.530
  8. Considering the context: social factors in responses to drugs in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 04; 235(4):935-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  9. MDMA does not alter responses to the Trier Social Stress Test in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jul; 234(14):2159-2166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  10. Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Aug; 42(9):1905-1913.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.468
  11. The effects of MDMA on socio-emotional processing: Does MDMA differ from other stimulants? J Psychopharmacol. 2016 12; 30(12):1248-1258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  12. Effects of d-amphetamine upon psychosocial stress responses. J Psychopharmacol. 2016 07; 30(7):608-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  13. Extinction of Conditioned Responses to Methamphetamine-Associated Stimuli in Healthy Humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 07; 233(13):2489-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  14. Effects of acute methamphetamine on emotional memory formation in humans: encoding vs consolidation. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.405
  15. Acquisition of responses to a methamphetamine-associated cue in healthy humans: self-report, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Jun; 40(7):1734-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  16. Amphetamine fails to alter cued recollection of emotional images: study of encoding, retrieval, and state-dependency. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e90423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.378
  17. Using conditioned place preference to identify relapse prevention medications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Nov; 37(9 Pt A):2081-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.358
  18. Psychopharmacology of theobromine in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Jul; 228(1):109-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  19. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans. J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar; 27(3):256-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  20. Does COMT genotype influence the effects of d-amphetamine on executive functioning? Genes Brain Behav. 2013 Feb; 12(1):13-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  21. Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans. Addict Biol. 2013 Nov; 18(6):985-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  22. Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar; 220(1):143-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.320
  23. Effect of d-amphetamine on post-error slowing in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar; 220(1):109-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  24. More on ADORA. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Dec; 212(4):699-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  25. Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 01; 109(1-3):175-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.287
  26. Evaluation of genetic variability in the dopamine receptor D2 in relation to behavioral inhibition and impulsivity/sensation seeking: an exploratory study with d-amphetamine in healthy participants. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Dec; 17(6):374-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.282
  27. Further evidence of association between amphetamine response and SLC6A2 gene variants. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Oct; 206(3):501-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.279
  28. Does stress reactivity or response to amphetamine predict smoking progression in young adults? A preliminary study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007 Feb; 86(2):312-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  29. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects of acute caffeine in light, nondependent caffeine users. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 May; 185(4):514-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  30. Menstrual cycle phase and responses to drugs of abuse in humans. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Sep 01; 84(1):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  31. Impact of childhood adversity on acute subjective effects of stimulant and opioid drugs: Evidence from placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Nov; 38(11):986-997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  32. The 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine enhances early visual processing for salient socio-emotional stimuli. Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Jun; 59(12):3224-3235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  33. Neural complexity is increased after low doses of LSD, but not moderate to high doses of oral THC or methamphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Jun; 49(7):1120-1128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  34. The effects of acute haloperidol or risperidone on subjective responses to methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Sep 01; 68(1):23-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  35. An fMRI study of the effect of amphetamine on brain activity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Dec; 25(6):925-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  36. Acute doses of d-amphetamine and bupropion increase cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Sep; 157(3):243-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  37. Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Apr; 25(4):540-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  38. Acute hydrocortisone administration does not affect subjective responses to d-amphetamine in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Jan; 153(3):380-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  39. Acute effects of d-amphetamine during the early and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000 Jul; 66(3):509-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  40. Acute effects of estradiol pretreatment on the response to d-amphetamine in women. Neuroendocrinology. 2000 Jan; 71(1):51-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  41. Anticipation of monetary reward in amygdala, insula, caudate are predictors of pleasure sensitivity to d-Amphetamine administration. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 01 01; 206:107725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  42. Acute effects of d-amphetamine during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jul; 145(1):67-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  43. Striatal activity correlates with stimulant-like effects of alcohol in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 12; 43(13):2532-2538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  44. Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 07; 43(8):1738-1744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  45. Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 07; 43(8):1732-1737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  46. Effects of d-amphetamine in grouped versus isolated humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 May-Jun; 57(1-2):333-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  47. Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects of d-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jun; 125(4):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  48. Individual differences in timing of peak positive subjective responses to d-amphetamine: Relationship to pharmacokinetics and physiology. J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Apr; 30(4):330-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  49. Acute tolerance to subjective but not cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine in normal, healthy men. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Feb; 16(1):72-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  50. Subjective responses to d-amphetamine alone and after pimozide pretreatment in normal, healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Jan 01; 39(1):26-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  51. Effects of acute doses of prosocial drugs methamphetamine and alcohol on plasma oxytocin levels. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun; 35(3):308-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  52. Amphetamine increases errors during episodic memory retrieval. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb; 34(1):85-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  53. Inattention, impulsive action, and subjective response to D-amphetamine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Nov 01; 133(1):127-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  54. Genetic factors modulating the response to stimulant drugs in humans. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2012; 12:537-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  55. Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec; 15(6):599-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  56. Norepinephrine transporter gene variation modulates acute response to D-amphetamine. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun 01; 61(11):1296-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  57. Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May; 31(5):1064-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  58. Association between the casein kinase 1 epsilon gene region and subjective response to D-amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May; 31(5):1056-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  59. Interindividual variation in anxiety response to amphetamine: possible role for adenosine A2A receptor gene variants. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005 Nov 05; 139B(1):42-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  60. Subjective effects of slow-release bupropion versus caffeine as determined in a quasi-naturalistic setting. Pharmacology. 2004 Apr; 70(4):206-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  61. Effects of stress on responses to methamphetamine in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Nov; 170(2):188-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  62. Association between A2a receptor gene polymorphisms and caffeine-induced anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Sep; 28(9):1694-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  63. Lack of effects of acute estradiol on mood in postmenopausal women. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Jan-Feb; 71(1-2):71-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  64. Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan; 233(1):89-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.