The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Gregory Karczmar and Aytekin Oto.
Gregory Karczmar
Connection Strength
8.699
Aytekin Oto
  1. Introduction to matrix-based method for analyzing hybrid multidimensional prostate MRI data. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Nov 20; e14544.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  2. Quantitative Multi-Parametric MRI of the Prostate Reveals Racial Differences. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 16; 16(20).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  3. Self-supervised multicontrast super-resolution for diffusion-weighted prostate MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2024 Jul; 92(1):319-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  4. Prostate Cancers Invisible on Multiparametric MRI: Pathologic Features in Correlation with Whole-Mount Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 13; 15(24).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  5. Four-quadrant vector mapping of hybrid multidimensional MRI data for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2024 Mar; 51(3):2057-2065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  6. Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Sep; 46(3):1215-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  7. An Interactive App with Multi-parametric MRI - Whole-Mount Histology Correlation for Enhanced Prostate MRI Training of Radiology Residents. Acad Radiol. 2023 09; 30 Suppl 1:S21-S29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  8. Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard Tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Res Sq. 2023 Feb 08.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  9. Comparing Radiologist Performance in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with Multiparametric versus Hybrid Multidimensional MRI. Radiology. 2022 11; 305(2):399-407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  10. Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusion-weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion. Magn Reson Med. 2022 11; 88(5):2298-2310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  11. Physically implausible signals as a quantitative quality assessment metric in prostate diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 07; 47(7):2500-2508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  12. Histological validation of prostate tissue composition measurement using hybrid multi-dimensional MRI: agreement with pathologists' measures. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 02; 47(2):801-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  13. Validation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MRI: Correlation with Histologic Findings. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):368-377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  14. Can Pre-treatment Quantitative Multi-parametric MRI Predict the Outcome of Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer? Acad Radiol. 2022 07; 29(7):977-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  15. Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2022 06; 29(6):796-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  16. High spectral and spatial resolution MRI of prostate cancer: a pilot study. Magn Reson Med. 2021 09; 86(3):1505-1513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  17. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  18. Comparison of DCE-MRI of murine model cancers with a low dose and high dose of contrast agent. Phys Med. 2021 Jan; 81:31-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  19. T2*-weighted MRI as a non-contrast-enhanced method for assessment of focal laser ablation zone extent in prostate cancer thermotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan; 31(1):325-332.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  20. Effect of Echo Times on Prostate Cancer Detection on T2-Weighted Images. Acad Radiol. 2020 11; 27(11):1555-1563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  21. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2019 08 07; 64(15):155012.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  22. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  23. Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 06; 44(6):2233-2243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  24. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  25. Comparison of T2-Weighted Imaging, DWI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Calculation of Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 02; 212(2):351-356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  26. Multiparametric MRI Features and Pathologic Outcome of Wedge-Shaped Lesions in the Peripheral Zone on T2-Weighted Images of the Prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 01; 212(1):124-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  27. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  28. Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium: Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2018 10; 53(10):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  29. MRI Findings After MRI-Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 09; 211(3):595-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  30. Performance of T2 Maps in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2019 01; 26(1):15-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  31. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study. Radiology. 2018 06; 287(3):864-873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  32. Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 30; 63(3):03NT01.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  33. Performance of Ultrafast DCE-MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2018 03; 25(3):349-358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  34. Pilot Study of the Use of Hybrid Multidimensional T2-Weighted Imaging-DWI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Evaluation of Gleason Score. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep; 207(3):592-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  35. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  36. Cavernosal nerve functionality evaluation after magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound treatment of the prostate. World J Radiol. 2015 Dec 28; 7(12):521-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  37. Benign Conditions That Mimic Prostate Carcinoma: MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2016 Jan-Feb; 36(1):162-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  38. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  39. Short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient estimated from diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct; 40(7):2523-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  40. IV Administered Gadodiamide Enters the Lumen of the Prostatic Glands: X-Ray Fluorescence Microscopy Examination of a Mouse Model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep; 205(3):W313-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  41. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul; 203(1):85-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  42. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol. 2014 May; 21(5):569-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  43. Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov; 201(5):1041-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  44. Hybrid multidimensional T(2) and diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr; 39(4):781-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  45. MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):932-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  46. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  47. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. World J Radiol. 2011 Oct 28; 3(10):241-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  48. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  49. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2010 Dec; 257(3):715-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  50. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  51. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. Acad Radiol. 2009 May; 16(5):597-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  52. Multi-model sequential analysis of MRI data for microstructure prediction in heterogeneous tissue. Sci Rep. 2023 10 01; 13(1):16486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  53. Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 10; 48(10):3216-3228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  54. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 05; 62(18):N445-N459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  55. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Characterization of a Hormone-Mediated Murine Model of Prostate Enlargement and Bladder Outlet Obstruction. Am J Pathol. 2017 Nov; 187(11):2378-2387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  56. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 04; 15(2):207-212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  57. High-resolution magnetic resonance colonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a murine model of colitis. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr; 63(4):922-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  58. Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Apr; 61(4):851-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.