Samuel G. Armato to Mesothelioma
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Samuel G. Armato has written about Mesothelioma.
Connection Strength
9.119
-
Considerations for Imaging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Consensus Statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 03; 18(3):278-298.
Score: 0.704
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 15th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2022 02; 164:76-83.
Score: 0.657
-
Correlation of patient survival with clinical tumor measurements in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun; 29(6):2981-2988.
Score: 0.536
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 14th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2019 04; 130:108-114.
Score: 0.532
-
Revised Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for Assessment of Response in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Version 1.1). J Thorac Oncol. 2018 07; 13(7):1012-1021.
Score: 0.511
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 13th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2016 11; 101:48-58.
Score: 0.455
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 12th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2015 Nov; 90(2):148-54.
Score: 0.422
-
Radiologic-pathologic correlation of mesothelioma tumor volume. Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar; 87(3):278-82.
Score: 0.407
-
Observer variability in mesothelioma tumor thickness measurements: defining minimally measurable lesions. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1187-94.
Score: 0.394
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: a review of the 11th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2013 Nov; 82(2):190-6.
Score: 0.368
-
Variability of tumor area measurements for response assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081916.
Score: 0.367
-
Disease volumes as a marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr; 24(4):999-1005.
Score: 0.349
-
Characterization of mesothelioma and tissues present in contrast-enhanced thoracic CT scans. Med Phys. 2011 Feb; 38(2):942-7.
Score: 0.309
-
Current state and future directions of pleural mesothelioma imaging. Lung Cancer. 2008 Mar; 59(3):411-20.
Score: 0.248
-
Variability in mesothelioma tumor response classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr; 186(4):1000-6.
Score: 0.221
-
The radiologic measurement of mesothelioma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005 Dec; 19(6):1053-66, vi.
Score: 0.216
-
Evaluation of semiautomated measurements of mesothelioma tumor thickness on CT scans. Acad Radiol. 2005 Oct; 12(10):1301-9.
Score: 0.214
-
Computerized analysis of mesothelioma on CT scans. Lung Cancer. 2005 Jul; 49 Suppl 1:S41-4.
Score: 0.206
-
Measurement of mesothelioma on thoracic CT scans: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted techniques. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1105-15.
Score: 0.194
-
Germline Variants Incidentally Detected via Tumor-Only Genomic Profiling of Patients With Mesothelioma. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 08 01; 6(8):e2327351.
Score: 0.184
-
The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 05; 47(5):1725-1740.
Score: 0.167
-
Optimization of response classification criteria for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, a validation study. Lung Cancer. 2019 12; 138:139-140.
Score: 0.142
-
EURACAN/IASLC Proposals for Updating the Histologic Classification of Pleural Mesothelioma: Towards a More Multidisciplinary Approach. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 01; 15(1):29-49.
Score: 0.141
-
Radiologic Considerations and Standardization of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Imaging Within Clinical Trials: Consensus Statement from the NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee - International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer - Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 10; 14(10):1718-1731.
Score: 0.140
-
Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 05 01; 36(13):1343-1373.
Score: 0.125
-
North American Multicenter Volumetric CT Study for Clinical Staging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Feasibility and Logistics of Setting Up a Quantitative Imaging Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 08; 11(8):1335-1344.
Score: 0.111
-
Lung volume measurements as a surrogate marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Apr; 8(4):478-86.
Score: 0.090
-
Optimization of response classification criteria for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Nov; 7(11):1728-34.
Score: 0.087
-
Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with malignant mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10; 30(20):2509-15.
Score: 0.085
-
Three-dimensional stereoscopic volume rendering of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int Surg. 2012 Jan-Mar; 97(1):65-70.
Score: 0.082
-
Computerized segmentation and measurement of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Med Phys. 2011 Jan; 38(1):238-44.
Score: 0.077
-
Quantitative measurement of lung reexpansion in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication. Acad Radiol. 2011 Mar; 18(3):294-8.
Score: 0.076
-
Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: a review of imaging research presented at the 9th International Meeting of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2010 Oct; 70(1):1-6.
Score: 0.074
-
The influence of initial outlines on manual segmentation. Med Phys. 2010 May; 37(5):2153-8.
Score: 0.073
-
Modeling of mesothelioma growth demonstrates weaknesses of current response criteria. Lung Cancer. 2006 May; 52(2):141-8.
Score: 0.055
-
Automated matching of temporally sequential CT sections. Med Phys. 2004 Dec; 31(12):3417-24.
Score: 0.050
-
Automated lung segmentation for thoracic CT impact on computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 2004 Sep; 11(9):1011-21.
Score: 0.050