The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Samuel Armato to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Samuel Armato has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.847
  1. Imaging in pleural Mesothelioma: A review of the 16th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2024 Jul; 193:107832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  2. Considerations for Imaging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Consensus Statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 03; 18(3):278-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  3. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 15th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2022 02; 164:76-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  4. Deep Learning Demonstrates Potential for Lung Cancer Detection in Chest Radiography. Radiology. 2020 12; 297(3):697-698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  5. Ontology-Based Radiology Teaching File Summarization, Coverage, and Integration. J Digit Imaging. 2020 06; 33(3):797-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  6. Response. Chest. 2019 10; 156(4):810-811.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  7. Critical Challenges to the Management of Clinical Trial Imaging: Recommendations for the Conduct of Imaging at Investigational Sites. Acad Radiol. 2020 02; 27(2):300-306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  8. Accuracy of the Vancouver Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model Compared With ThatĀ of Radiologists. Chest. 2019 07; 156(1):112-119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  9. Correlation of patient survival with clinical tumor measurements in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun; 29(6):2981-2988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  10. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 14th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2019 04; 130:108-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  11. Revised Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for Assessment of Response in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Version 1.1). J Thorac Oncol. 2018 07; 13(7):1012-1021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  12. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 13th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2016 11; 101:48-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  13. Toward Understanding the Size Dependence of Shape Features for Predicting Spiculation in Lung Nodules for Computer-Aided Diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 2015 Dec; 28(6):704-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  14. Comparison of Two Deformable Registration Algorithms in the Presence of Radiologic Change Between Serial Lung CT Scans. J Digit Imaging. 2015 Dec; 28(6):755-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  15. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 12th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2015 Nov; 90(2):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  16. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of mesothelioma tumor volume. Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar; 87(3):278-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  17. Observer variability in mesothelioma tumor thickness measurements: defining minimally measurable lesions. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1187-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  18. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: a review of the 11th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2013 Nov; 82(2):190-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  19. Variability of tumor area measurements for response assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081916.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  20. Disease volumes as a marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr; 24(4):999-1005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  21. Lung texture in serial thoracic CT scans: assessment of change introduced by image registration. Med Phys. 2012 Aug; 39(8):4679-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Med Phys. 2011 Feb; 38(2):915-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  23. Characterization of mesothelioma and tissues present in contrast-enhanced thoracic CT scans. Med Phys. 2011 Feb; 38(2):942-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  24. The influence of initial outlines on manual segmentation. Med Phys. 2010 May; 37(5):2153-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  25. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: mutual information as a measure of image quality. Med Phys. 2009 Dec; 36(12):5675-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  26. Temporal subtraction chest radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov; 72(2):238-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  27. A modified gradient correlation filter for image segmentation: application to airway and bowel. Med Phys. 2009 Feb; 36(2):480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  28. Assessment of radiologist performance in the detection of lung nodules: dependence on the definition of "truth". Acad Radiol. 2009 Jan; 16(1):28-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  29. The Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer (RIDER) project: a resource for the development of change-analysis software. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Oct; 84(4):448-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  30. Discrete-space versus continuous-space lesion boundary and area definitions. Med Phys. 2008 Sep; 35(9):4070-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  31. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2008 May; 23(2):77-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  32. Current state and future directions of pleural mesothelioma imaging. Lung Cancer. 2008 Mar; 59(3):411-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  33. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): ensuring the integrity of expert-defined "truth". Acad Radiol. 2007 Dec; 14(12):1455-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): an evaluation of radiologist variability in the identification of lung nodules on CT scans. Acad Radiol. 2007 Nov; 14(11):1409-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. Two-dimensional extrapolation methods for texture analysis on CT scans. Med Phys. 2007 Sep; 34(9):3465-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Temporal subtraction of dual-energy chest radiographs. Med Phys. 2006 Jun; 33(6):1911-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  37. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: automated assessment of registration accuracy. Med Phys. 2006 May; 33(5):1239-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  38. Variability in mesothelioma tumor response classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr; 186(4):1000-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  39. The Business of Scientific Publishing. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 01 08; 17(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  40. The radiologic measurement of mesothelioma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005 Dec; 19(6):1053-66, vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. Evaluation of semiautomated measurements of mesothelioma tumor thickness on CT scans. Acad Radiol. 2005 Oct; 12(10):1301-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  42. Computerized analysis of mesothelioma on CT scans. Lung Cancer. 2005 Jul; 49 Suppl 1:S41-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  43. Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1). Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar; 12(3):337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  44. Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology. 2004 Sep; 232(3):739-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  45. Automated lung segmentation for thoracic CT impact on computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 2004 Sep; 11(9):1011-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Measurement of mesothelioma on thoracic CT scans: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted techniques. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1105-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  47. AI in medical imaging grand challenges: translation from competition to research benefit and patient care. Br J Radiol. 2023 Oct; 96(1150):20221152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  48. Image annotation for conveying automated lung nodule detection results to radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2003 Sep; 10(9):1000-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  49. Germline Variants Incidentally Detected via Tumor-Only Genomic Profiling of Patients With Mesothelioma. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 08 01; 6(8):e2327351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  50. Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach. Med Phys. 2003 Jun; 30(6):1188-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  51. Emphysema Detection in the Course of Lung Cancer Screening: Optimizing a Rare Opportunity to Impact Population Health. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 04; 20(4):499-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  52. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: effect of image reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys. 2003 Mar; 30(3):461-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  53. A Competition, Benchmark, Code, and Data for Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 02 01; 6(2):e230524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  54. AAPM task group report 273: Recommendations on best practices for AI and machine learning for computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. Med Phys. 2023 Feb; 50(2):e1-e24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  55. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):685-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  56. Interviewing for residency positions while completing a graduate degree: Considerations for graduate students, mentors, and program directors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 08; 23(8):e13700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  57. The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 05; 47(5):1725-1740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  58. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Dec; 20(12):1205-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys. 2001 Aug; 28(8):1552-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  60. Anatomic Point-Based Lung Region with Zone Identification for Radiologist Annotation and Machine Learning for Chest Radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 2021 08; 34(4):922-931.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  61. QIBA guidance: Computed tomography imaging for COVID-19 quantitative imaging applications. Clin Imaging. 2021 Sep; 77:151-157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  62. Automated registration of frontal and lateral radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2000 Jul; 7(7):530-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Optimization of response classification criteria for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, a validation study. Lung Cancer. 2019 12; 138:139-140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  64. EURACAN/IASLC Proposals for Updating the Histologic Classification of Pleural Mesothelioma: Towards a More Multidisciplinary Approach. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 01; 15(1):29-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  65. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. Radiographics. 1999 Sep-Oct; 19(5):1303-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  66. Radiologic Considerations and Standardization of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Imaging Within Clinical Trials: Consensus Statement from the NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee - International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer - Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 10; 14(10):1718-1731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  67. Computerized analysis of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs: evaluation of potential utility. J Digit Imaging. 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  68. Autosegmentation for thoracic radiation treatment planning: A grand challenge at AAPM 2017. Med Phys. 2018 Oct; 45(10):4568-4581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  69. Computer-assisted Curie scoring for metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans in patients with neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 12; 65(12):e27417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  70. Automated lung segmentation in digital lateral chest radiographs. Med Phys. 1998 Aug; 25(8):1507-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  71. Computerized delineation and analysis of costophrenic angles in digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 May; 5(5):329-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  72. Automated lung segmentation in digitized posteroanterior chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1998 Apr; 5(4):245-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  73. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 05 01; 36(13):1343-1373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  74. Quality assurance and quantitative imaging biomarkers in low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  75. Three-dimensional image analysis for staging chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 11; 7(11):1052-1057.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  76. Incorporation of pre-therapy 18 F-FDG uptake data with CT texture features into a radiomics model for radiation pneumonitis diagnosis. Med Phys. 2017 Jul; 44(7):3686-3694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  77. Automated registration of ventilation-perfusion images with digital chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 1997 Mar; 4(3):183-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  78. Clinical significance of noncalcified lung nodules in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep; 159(2):265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  79. North American Multicenter Volumetric CT Study for Clinical Staging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Feasibility and Logistics of Setting Up a Quantitative Imaging Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 08; 11(8):1335-1344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  80. Computer-assisted staging of chronic rhinosinusitis correlates with symptoms. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Jul; 5(7):637-642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  81. Role of the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance in optimizing CT for the evaluation of lung cancer screen-detected nodules. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr; 12(4):390-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  82. Lung texture in serial thoracic computed tomography scans: correlation of radiomics-based features with radiation therapy dose and radiation pneumonitis development. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 01; 91(5):1048-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  83. Computer-aided nodule detection system: results in an unselected series of consecutive chest radiographs. Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr; 22(4):475-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  84. Lung texture in serial thoracic CT scans: correlation with radiologist-defined severity of acute changes following radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21; 59(18):5387-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  85. CT-based pulmonary artery measurements for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr; 21(4):523-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  86. Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):087001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  87. Lung texture in serial thoracic CT scans: registration-based methods to compare anatomically matched regions. Med Phys. 2013 Jun; 40(6):061906.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  88. Lung volume measurements as a surrogate marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Apr; 8(4):478-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  89. Optimization of response classification criteria for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Nov; 7(11):1728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  90. Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone suppression imaging. Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec; 22(12):2729-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  91. Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with malignant mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10; 30(20):2509-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  92. Three-dimensional stereoscopic volume rendering of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int Surg. 2012 Jan-Mar; 97(1):65-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  93. Computerized segmentation and measurement of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Med Phys. 2011 Jan; 38(1):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  94. Quantitative measurement of lung reexpansion in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication. Acad Radiol. 2011 Mar; 18(3):294-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  95. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: a review of imaging research presented at the 9th International Meeting of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 2010 Oct; 70(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  96. Lymphatic vessel density is not associated with lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Dec; 132(12):1882-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  97. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  98. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) data collection process for nodule detection and annotation. Acad Radiol. 2007 Dec; 14(12):1464-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  99. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): a comparison of different size metrics for pulmonary nodule measurements. Acad Radiol. 2007 Dec; 14(12):1475-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  100. Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1254-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  101. Automated lung segmentation of diseased and artifact-corrupted magnetic resonance sections. Med Phys. 2006 Sep; 33(9):3085-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  102. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: false-positive reduction with the radial-gradient index. Med Phys. 2006 Apr; 33(4):1133-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  103. Modeling of mesothelioma growth demonstrates weaknesses of current response criteria. Lung Cancer. 2006 May; 52(2):141-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  104. Vessel tree reconstruction in thoracic CT scans with application to nodule detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Apr; 24(4):486-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  105. Automated matching of temporally sequential CT sections. Med Phys. 2004 Dec; 31(12):3417-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  106. Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium. Acad Radiol. 2004 Apr; 11(4):462-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  107. Massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography. Med Phys. 2003 Jul; 30(7):1602-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  108. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology. 2002 Dec; 225(3):673-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  109. Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. Radiology. 1997 Feb; 202(2):447-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.