Joseph Caprini to Risk Assessment
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joseph Caprini has written about Risk Assessment.
Connection Strength
4.086
-
Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification: The Missing Link in Hospitalized Patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Nov 01; 25(11):1087-1088.
Score: 0.357
-
Letter to the Editor on "Correlation of the Caprini Score and Venous Thromboembolism Incidence Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty-Results of a Single-Institution Protocol". J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2697-2698.
Score: 0.355
-
Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of cancer-associated thromboembolism. Int Angiol. 2018 Aug; 37(4):269-276.
Score: 0.355
-
Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Tool for Spanish, Arabic, and Polish Speakers. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr; 24(3):502-512.
Score: 0.348
-
Individual risk assessment is the best strategy for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Dis Mon. 2010 Oct; 56(10):552-9.
Score: 0.211
-
A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010 Feb; 251(2):344-50.
Score: 0.201
-
Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of the many faces of venous thromboembolism. Am J Surg. 2010 Jan; 199(1 Suppl):S3-10.
Score: 0.200
-
Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon. 2005 Feb-Mar; 51(2-3):70-8.
Score: 0.142
-
Dissecting the rationale for thromboprophylaxis in challenging surgical cases. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Mar; 22(3):613-619.
Score: 0.132
-
A New Chapter Regarding Thrombosis Risk Assessment in Total Joint Replacement Patients. Thromb Haemost. 2024 Mar; 124(3):236-238.
Score: 0.129
-
The Thresholds of Caprini Score Associated With Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Across Different Specialties: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg. 2023 06 01; 277(6):929-937.
Score: 0.125
-
The original and modified Caprini score equally predicts venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 11; 9(6):1371-1381.e4.
Score: 0.109
-
Clinical Validation of the Chinese Version of Patient Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Form. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec; 26:1076029620945038.
Score: 0.100
-
Risk Assessment After Orthopaedic Trauma: Coming of Age. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 06; 33(6):275.
Score: 0.096
-
Prediction of early mortality in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis in the RIETE Database. Int Angiol. 2019 Jun; 38(3):173-184.
Score: 0.096
-
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using the Caprini score. Dis Mon. 2019 Aug; 65(8):249-298.
Score: 0.093
-
Implementation and Validation of the 2013 Caprini Score for Risk Stratification of Arthroplasty Patients in the Prevention of Venous Thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec; 25:1076029619838066.
Score: 0.093
-
Completion of the Updated Caprini Risk Assessment Model (2013 Version). Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec; 25:1076029619838052.
Score: 0.093
-
The limited utility of currently available venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools in gynecological oncology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 03; 216(3):326.
Score: 0.080
-
Balancing the risk of complications in foot and ankle surgical patients taking antithrombotic medication. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Dec; 7(6):507-14.
Score: 0.069
-
Critical issues in deep vein thrombosis prevention. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov; 52(5 Suppl):64S-65S.
Score: 0.053
-
Risk assessment as a guide to thrombosis prophylaxis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010 Sep; 16(5):448-52.
Score: 0.052
-
Venous thromboembolism in surgery--a preventable complication. Introduction. Am J Surg. 2010 Jan; 199(1 Suppl):S1-2.
Score: 0.050
-
Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the plastic surgery patient: current guidelines and recommendations. Aesthet Surg J. 2009 Sep-Oct; 29(5):421-8.
Score: 0.049
-
Anticoagulants for thrombosis prophylaxis following surgery: a continuing saga. Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jun; 99(6):993-4.
Score: 0.045
-
Venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery: what is the risk after discharge? Orthopedics. 2006 06; 29(6):506-16.
Score: 0.039
-
Treatment of venous thromboembolism: adherence to guidelines and impact of physician knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct; 42(4):726-33.
Score: 0.037
-
Using the Caprini Risk Score to Increase Awareness of Venous Thrombus Embolism in the Community: Know Your Score II. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec; 29:10760296231188425.
Score: 0.031
-
Thrombosis prophylaxis in surgical patients using the Caprini Risk Score. Curr Probl Surg. 2022 11; 59(11):101221.
Score: 0.030
-
A Prospective Study Evaluating Patterns of Responses to the Caprini Score to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism After Interventional Treatment for Varicose Veins. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec; 28:10760296221112081.
Score: 0.029
-
Effective risk stratification of surgical and nonsurgical patients for venous thromboembolic disease. Semin Hematol. 2001 Apr; 38(2 Suppl 5):12-9.
Score: 0.027
-
Finding the right fit: effective thrombosis risk stratification in orthopedic patients. Orthopedics. 2000 Jun; 23(6 Suppl):s633-8.
Score: 0.026
-
Risk factor assessment in the management of patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Int Angiol. 2000 Mar; 19(1):47-51.
Score: 0.025
-
Scientific and Standardization Committee Communication: Guidance document on the periprocedural management of patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy: Recommendations for standardized reporting of procedural/surgical bleed risk and patient-specific thromboembolic risk. J Thromb Haemost. 2019 11; 17(11):1966-1972.
Score: 0.024
-
Matching risk with treatment strategies in deep vein thrombosis management. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1999 Aug; 10 Suppl 2:S37-43.
Score: 0.024
-
Risk Assessment in Chinese Hospitalized Patients Comparing the Padua and Caprini Scoring Algorithms. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec; 24(9_suppl):127S-135S.
Score: 0.023
-
Patterns of Failure of a Standardized Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Protocol. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 06; 222(6):1074-80.
Score: 0.019
-
Evaluation of the acute coronary syndrome safety profile of dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery: findings from four Phase 3 trials. Thromb Res. 2012 Sep; 130(3):396-402.
Score: 0.015
-
Can combined (mechanical and pharmacological) modalities prevent fatal VTE? Int Angiol. 2011 Apr; 30(2):115-22.
Score: 0.014
-
Prevention and treatment of the postthrombotic syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov; 52(5 Suppl):21S-28S.
Score: 0.013
-
Dabigatran versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: a pooled analysis of three trials. Thromb Res. 2010 Sep; 126(3):175-82.
Score: 0.013
-
Call to action to prevent venous thromboembolism. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jun; 49(6):1620-3.
Score: 0.012
-
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan; 101(1):77-85.
Score: 0.012
-
Thromboembolic diseases. Curr Probl Surg. 2008 Dec; 45(12):844-99.
Score: 0.012
-
Increasing awareness about venous disease: The American Venous Forum expands the National Venous Screening Program. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Aug; 48(2):394-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Venous thromboembolism and cancer. Curr Probl Surg. 2007 Mar; 44(3):157-216.
Score: 0.010
-
A guide to venous thromboembolism risk factor assessment. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000 Apr; 9(3):253-62.
Score: 0.006