The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Stephen Haggerty to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Stephen Haggerty has written about Humans.
Stephen Haggerty
Connection Strength
0.485
Humans
  1. Impact of bariatric surgery on pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective Studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2026 Aug; 22(8):901-909.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  2. Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2024 12; 28(6):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  3. SAGES peritoneal dialysis access guideline update 2023. Surg Endosc. 2024 01; 38(1):1-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  4. Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2023 02; 225(2):252-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  5. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia offers similar outcomes and quality of life to primary laparoscopic repair. Hernia. 2021 02; 25(1):165-172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  6. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches are equally effective for spigelian hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1827-1833.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  7. Moving skills training closer to application: In-rotation skills curriculum is feasible and effective. Am J Surg. 2018 Feb; 215(2):272-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  8. Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc. 2018 04; 32(4):1714-1723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  9. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):924-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Acute Genital Edema during Peritoneal Dialysis: A Review for Surgeons. Am Surg. 2015 Nov; 81(11):1187-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov; 28(11):3016-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  12. Laparoscopy to evaluate scrotal edema during peritoneal dialysis. JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep; 17(3):429-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using a Quinton percutaneous insertion kit. JSLS. 2007 Apr-Jun; 11(2):208-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  14. Does (patient) size matter? the impact of body mass index on outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transversus abdominis release. Hernia. 2025 12 17; 30(1):41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. A 13-year experience with biologic and biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforced laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2023 09; 37(9):7271-7279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Teaching endoscopic management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage using a modular simulation curriculum. Surgery. 2023 03; 173(3):702-709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. A Tailored Approach to Laparoscopic Fundoplication: Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Dysmotility. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 12; 26(12):2426-2433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. "Into the fire" approach to teaching endoscopic foreign body removal using a modular simulation curriculum. Surg Endosc. 2023 02; 37(2):1412-1420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Resident performance in simulation module is associated with operating room performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9273-9280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6896-6902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  21. Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things? Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6661-6671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. A modular simulation curriculum to teach endoscopic stenting to practicing surgeons: an "Into the fire" approach. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6859-6867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):577-583.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Guidelines for the performance of minimally invasive splenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021 11; 35(11):5877-5888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  25. Crural closure, not fundoplication, results in a significant decrease in lower esophageal sphincter distensibility. Surg Endosc. 2022 06; 36(6):3893-3901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. Teaching EndoFLIP Impedance Planimetry to Practicing Endoscopists: An "Into the Fire" Approach to Simulation. Surg Innov. 2022 Apr; 29(2):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. Identification of fifty-seven novel loci for abdominal wall hernia development and their biological and clinical implications: results from the UK Biobank. Hernia. 2022 02; 26(1):335-348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  28. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines development: standard operating procedure. Surg Endosc. 2021 06; 35(6):2417-2427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  29. Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients. Surg Endosc. 2022 02; 36(2):1609-1618.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  30. Significant changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements after peroral pyloromyotomy for delayed gastric emptying. Surg Endosc. 2022 02; 36(2):1536-1543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  31. Mesh in Elective Hernia Repair: 10-Year Experience with over 6,000 Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 07; 233(1):51-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  32. SAGES guidelines: an appraisal of their quality and value by SAGES members. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1493-1499.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  33. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2021 12; 35(12):7174-7182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  34. Teaching peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) to practicing endoscopists: An "into-the-fire" approach to simulation. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):502-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  35. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  36. Using a standardized intra-operative endoflip protocol during fundoplication to identify factors that affect distensibility. Surg Endosc. 2021 10; 35(10):5717-5723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  37. Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  38. Intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) results and development of esophagitis in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2021 08; 35(8):4555-4562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  39. Factors associated with admission after implementation of a same-day discharge pathway in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2021 07; 35(7):3971-3980.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. Short-term quality of life comparison of laparoscopic, open, and robotic incisional hernia repairs. Surg Endosc. 2021 06; 35(6):2781-2788.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  41. Use of Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) in Foregut Surgery Practice: Experience of More than 400 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 07; 231(1):160-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  42. Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral. Obes Surg. 2020 02; 30(2):521-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  43. Long-term outcomes after subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy: A retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 2020 09; 220(3):736-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  44. Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):615-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  45. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):607-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  46. EAES and SAGES 2018 consensus conference on acute diverticulitis management: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):2726-2741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  47. An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 08; 33(8):2670-2679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  48. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):3008-3013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  49. Patient-Centered Outcomes after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 07; 227(1):106-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018 06; 32(6):2847-2851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. Characterization of common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high-volume hospital system. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1184-1191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  52. Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb; 32(2):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  53. Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron. Hernia. 2017 08; 21(4):619-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  54. Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc. 2017 06; 31(6):2667-2677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  55. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 05; 31(5):2109-2121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  56. Primary obesity surgery endoluminal. Surg Endosc. 2017 02; 31(2):951.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  57. Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair and Quality of Life at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 07; 223(1):153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  58. Efficacy of a Required Preoperative Weight Loss Program for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr; 20(4):667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  59. Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec; 29(12):3528-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  60. Six month outcomes in patients experiencing weight gain after gastric bypass who underwent gastrojejunal revision using an endoluminal suturing device. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug; 29(8):2133-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  61. Predicting regression of Barrett's esophagus: results from a retrospective cohort of 1342 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct; 28(10):2803-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  62. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009 May; 23(5):930-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  63. Should pulmonary lesions be resected at the time of open heart surgery? Am Surg. 1996 Apr; 62(4):300-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.