The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Gene H. Kim to Postoperative Complications

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gene H. Kim has written about Postoperative Complications.
Connection Strength

0.405
  1. Impact of worsening of aortic insufficiency during HeartMate 3 LVAD support. Artif Organs. 2021 Mar; 45(3):297-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  2. Impact of Residual Valve Disease on Survival After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 12; 106(6):1789-1796.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  3. Consequences of Retained Defibrillator and Pacemaker Leads After Heart Transplantation-An Underrecognized Problem. J Card Fail. 2018 02; 24(2):101-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. Cardiac toxoplasmosis after heart transplantation diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015 Oct; 17(5):719-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  5. Increased Rate of Pump Thrombosis and Cardioembolic Events Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J. 2020 Nov/Dec; 66(10):1127-1136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. Prevention of postsurgical lymphedema via immediate delivery of sustained-release 9-cis retinoic acid to the lymphedenectomy site. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan; 121(1):100-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  7. A subcostal approach is favorable compared to sternotomy for left ventricular assist device exchange field of research: artificial heart (clinical). J Artif Organs. 2019 Sep; 22(3):181-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  8. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Left Ventricular Assist Device Decreases Thromboembolic Events. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 04; 107(4):1181-1186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  9. Efficacy of computed tomography in detecting hepatocellular cancer in adult liver transplant candidates. Transplant Proc. 2001 Feb-Mar; 33(1-2):1854-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.