The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Katharine Yao to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Katharine Yao has written about United States.
Connection Strength

1.158
  1. Rates of newly diagnosed breast cancer at commission on cancer facilities during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer Med. 2024 Jan; 13(1):e6874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  2. Covid-19 related oncologist's concerns about breast cancer treatment delays and physician well-being (the CROWN study). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr; 186(3):625-635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  3. Impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Margin Guidelines on Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Trends. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 07; 229(1):104-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  4. Treatment delays from transfers of care and their impact on breast cancer quality measures. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb; 173(3):603-617.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  5. Regional Variation in Performance for Commission on Cancer Breast Quality Measures and Impact on Overall Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct; 25(10):3069-3075.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  6. Are the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Findings Being Applied to Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Breast J. 2017 Sep; 23(5):554-562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  7. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy and overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 115(6):668-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  8. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers Demonstrates Improved Compliance with Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy Quality Measure. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar; 224(3):236-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  9. Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 11; 160(1):111-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  10. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Additional Considerations and a Framework for Shared Decision Making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 10; 23(10):3106-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  11. Increased utilization of postmastectomy radiotherapy in the United States from 2003 to 2011 in patients with one to three tumor positive nodes. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec; 112(8):809-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  12. Variation in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Rates According to Racial Groups in Young Women with Breast Cancer, 1998 to 2011: A Report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul; 221(1):187-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  13. Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Randomized Trial on the Number of Axillary Nodes Removed for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul; 221(1):71-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  14. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010. JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec; 149(12):1296-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  15. Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar; 22(3):899-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  16. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov; 215(5):658-66; discussion 666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  17. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct; 17(10):2554-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  18. Declination of Treatment, Racial and Ethnic Disparity, and Overall Survival in US Patients With Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 01; 7(5):e249449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  19. A national quality improvement study identifying and addressing cancer screening deficits due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer. 2022 06 01; 128(11):2119-2125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  20. The effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on breast-related charges: A 5-year analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul; 118(1):212-220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  21. Facility-level analysis of robot utilization across disciplines in the National Cancer Database. J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr; 13(2):293-299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  22. Risk of Development of Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer following an Index Breast Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 02; 158(2):303-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  23. Evaluation of the Quality of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Delivery for Breast Cancer Care in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jul 01; 3(7):928-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  24. Utilization trend and regimens of hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 04; 162(2):317-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  25. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Data on CPM Outcomes and Risks. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 10; 23(10):3100-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. Utilization of Axillary Surgery for Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Report From the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 10; 23(10):3337-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Advanced Age Does Not Worsen Recovery or Long-Term Morbidity After Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb; 76(2):164-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  28. The Effect of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy on Perioperative Complications in Women Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct; 22(11):3474-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.