Monica Rosenberg to Attention
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Monica Rosenberg has written about Attention.
Connection Strength
6.770
-
Edge-Based General Linear Models Capture Moment-to-Moment Fluctuations in Attention. J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 03; 44(14).
Score: 0.679
-
Assessing the impact of attention fluctuations on statistical learning. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May; 86(4):1086-1107.
Score: 0.662
-
Neural signatures of attentional engagement during narratives and its consequences for event memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 08 17; 118(33).
Score: 0.566
-
Connectome-based neurofeedback: A pilot study to improve sustained attention. Neuroimage. 2020 05 15; 212:116684.
Score: 0.511
-
Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 02 18; 117(7):3797-3807.
Score: 0.509
-
Connectome-based Models Predict Separable Components of Attention in Novel Individuals. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):160-173.
Score: 0.434
-
Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention. J Neurosci. 2016 09 14; 36(37):9547-57.
Score: 0.402
-
A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan; 19(1):165-71.
Score: 0.380
-
Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state. Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 01; 114:249-56.
Score: 0.363
-
Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Apr; 75(3):426-39.
Score: 0.317
-
Large-scale neural dynamics in a shared low-dimensional state space reflect cognitive and attentional dynamics. Elife. 2023 07 03; 12.
Score: 0.161
-
A generalizable connectome-based marker of in-scan sustained attention in neurodiverse youth. Cereb Cortex. 2023 05 09; 33(10):6320-6334.
Score: 0.159
-
Functional connectome stability and optimality are markers of cognitive performance. Cereb Cortex. 2023 04 04; 33(8):5025-5041.
Score: 0.158
-
Differences in the functional brain architecture of sustained attention and working memory in youth and adults. PLoS Biol. 2022 12; 20(12):e3001938.
Score: 0.155
-
Predicting visual memory across images and within individuals. Cognition. 2022 10; 227:105201.
Score: 0.151
-
Overlapping attentional networks yield divergent behavioral predictions across tasks: Neuromarkers for diffuse and focused attention? Neuroimage. 2020 04 01; 209:116535.
Score: 0.127
-
Distributed Patterns of Functional Connectivity Predict Working Memory Performance in Novel Healthy and Memory-impaired Individuals. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):241-255.
Score: 0.125
-
An information network flow approach for measuring functional connectivity and predicting behavior. Brain Behav. 2019 08; 9(8):e01346.
Score: 0.122
-
Dynamic functional connectivity during task performance and rest predicts individual differences in attention across studies. Neuroimage. 2019 03; 188:14-25.
Score: 0.117
-
Connectome-based models predict attentional control in aging adults. Neuroimage. 2019 02 01; 186:1-13.
Score: 0.116
-
Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets. Neuroimage. 2018 02 15; 167:11-22.
Score: 0.109
-
A functional connectivity-based neuromarker of sustained attention generalizes to predict recall in a reading task. Neuroimage. 2018 02 01; 166:99-109.
Score: 0.108
-
Pattern classification of EEG signals reveals perceptual and attentional states. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0176349.
Score: 0.105
-
Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29; 34(5):1724-30.
Score: 0.084
-
In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov; 23(11):2712-23.
Score: 0.076
-
A cognitive state transformation model for task-general and task-specific subsystems of the brain connectome. Neuroimage. 2022 08 15; 257:119279.
Score: 0.037
-
A brain-based general measure of attention. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 06; 6(6):782-795.
Score: 0.037