The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Jonathan Chung to Practice Guidelines as Topic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jonathan Chung has written about Practice Guidelines as Topic.
Connection Strength

1.211
  1. CT-Pathologic Correlation of Major Types of Pulmonary Fibrosis: Insights for Revisions to Current Guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May; 210(5):1034-1041.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.383
  2. ACR appropriateness criteria blunt chest trauma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Apr; 11(4):345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  3. HRCT evaluation of patients with interstitial lung disease: comparison of the 2018 and 2011 diagnostic guidelines. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec; 14:1753466620968496.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  4. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Routine Chest Radiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2016 Mar; 31(2):W13-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  5. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Nov; 30(6):W63-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  6. ACR appropriateness criteria® hemoptysis. J Thorac Imaging. 2014 May; 29(3):W19-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  7. ACR appropriateness Criteria® radiographically detected solitary pulmonary nodule. J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Jan; 28(1):W1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  8. ACR appropriateness criteria(®)acute respiratory illness in immunocompromised patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Mar; 9(3):164-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  9. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Respiratory Illness in Immunocompromised Patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Nov; 16(11S):S331-S339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  10. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute respiratory illness in immunocompromised patients. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 May; 30(3):W2-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  11. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pulmonary hypertension. J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Jul; 28(4):W57-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.