Douglas R. Dirschl to Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Douglas R. Dirschl has written about Adult.
Connection Strength
0.293
-
Association of Injury Energy Level and Neurovascular Injury Following Knee Dislocation. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 11; 32(11):579-584.
Score: 0.041
-
Contractability: Now and Forever: Commentary on an article by Kim Madden, MSc, et al.: "Predicting and Preventing Loss to Follow-up of Adult Trauma Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials. An Example from the FLOW Trial". J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 07 05; 99(13):e75.
Score: 0.038
-
Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of a Middle Cuneiform Fracture in a Hockey Player. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 07; 95(7):e98-e102.
Score: 0.035
-
Reliability and validity of a mobile phone for radiographic assessment of ankle injuries: a randomized inter- and intraobserver agreement study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Feb; 34(2):228-33.
Score: 0.028
-
Comparison of SF-36 and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment in recovery from fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Orthopedics. 2007 02; 30(2):145-51.
Score: 0.018
-
The ballistic articular structure injury classification (BASIC) system: clarifying ballistic articular injuries. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug; 34(6):3181-3191.
Score: 0.015
-
Tibial plafond fractures. How do these ankles function over time? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb; 85(2):287-95.
Score: 0.014
-
Best Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Osteoporosis in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Spinal Reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jan 15; 47(2):128-135.
Score: 0.013
-
Financial Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Surgical Treatment of Foot and Ankle Osteomyelitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jan - Feb; 59(1):69-74.
Score: 0.011
-
Effects of driving distance and transport time on mortality among Level I and II traumas occurring in a metropolitan area. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct; 85(4):756-765.
Score: 0.010
-
A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model. J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Oct; 11(7):471-6.
Score: 0.010
-
The Economic Impact of Acetabular Labral Tears: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Structured Rehabilitation Alone in Patients Without Osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2016 07; 44(7):1771-80.
Score: 0.009
-
Osteomyelitis. Common causes and treatment recommendations. Drugs. 1993 Jan; 45(1):29-43.
Score: 0.007
-
Pseudotumor of the distal part of the femur in a patient who had myelomeningocele. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Jul; 74(6):935-8.
Score: 0.007
-
The sequential recovery of health status after tibial plafond fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Aug; 24(8):499-504.
Score: 0.006
-
Hemorrhage in pelvic fractures does not correlate with fracture length. J Trauma. 2008 Aug; 65(2):436-41.
Score: 0.005
-
Tibial plafond fractures treated by articulated external fixation: a randomized trial of postoperative motion versus nonmotion. J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep; 20(8):536-41.
Score: 0.004
-
Correlation of transfusion volume to change in hematocrit. Am J Hematol. 2006 Feb; 81(2):145-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep; 87(9):2122-30.
Score: 0.004
-
Factors affecting outcome in tibial plafond fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jun; (423):93-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Change over time of SF-36 functional outcomes for operatively treated unstable ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Jan; 16(1):30-3.
Score: 0.003
-
Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 May; 15(4):271-4.
Score: 0.003
-
Rank order analysis of tibial plafond fractures: does injury or reduction predict outcome? Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Jan; 20(1):44-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Fractures of the radius and ulna in adults: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Iowa Orthop J. 1997; 17:14-9.
Score: 0.002