The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Lixing Yang to Genome, Human

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lixing Yang has written about Genome, Human.
Lixing Yang
Connection Strength
6.180
Genome, Human
  1. Somatic structural variation signatures in pediatric brain tumors. Cell Rep. 2023 10 31; 42(10):113276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  2. A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2020 09; 107(1):e103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.460
  3. Butler enables rapid cloud-based analysis of thousands of human genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2020 03; 38(3):288-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  4. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):82-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  5. Analyzing Somatic Genome Rearrangements in Human Cancers by Using Whole-Exome Sequencing. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 05 05; 98(5):843-856.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  6. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015 Jan 29; 517(7536):576-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.312
  7. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014 Sep 11; 513(7517):202-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  8. Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell. 2013 May 09; 153(4):919-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  9. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature. 2012 Sep 27; 489(7417):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  10. Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples. Nat Commun. 2020 09 21; 11(1):4748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  11. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes identifies driver rearrangements promoted by LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):306-319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  12. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):294-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  13. The landscape of viral associations in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):320-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  14. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):112-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  15. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017 01 12; 541(7636):169-175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  16. Starfish infers signatures of complex genomic rearrangements across human cancers. Nat Cancer. 2022 10; 3(10):1247-1259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  17. The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):122-128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  18. Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):342-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  19. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):331-341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  20. Analyses of non-coding somatic drivers in 2,658 cancer whole genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):102-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  21. A Pan-Cancer Compendium of Genes Deregulated by Somatic Genomic Rearrangement across More Than 1,400 Cases. Cell Rep. 2018 07 10; 24(2):515-527.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  22. The Cancer Genome Atlas Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2018 04 03; 23(1):313-326.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  23. Characterization of HPV and host genome interactions in primary head and neck cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28; 111(43):15544-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  24. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013 May 02; 497(7447):67-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  25. Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):733.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  26. Combined burden and functional impact tests for cancer driver discovery using DriverPower. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):734.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  27. Divergent mutational processes distinguish hypoxic and normoxic tumours. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  28. Reconstructing evolutionary trajectories of mutation signature activities in cancer using TrackSig. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  29. A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):728.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  30. Pathway and network analysis of more than 2500 whole cancer genomes. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  31. Cancer LncRNA Census reveals evidence for deep functional conservation of long noncoding RNAs in tumorigenesis. Commun Biol. 2020 02 05; 3(1):56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  32. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  33. Sex differences in oncogenic mutational processes. Nat Commun. 2020 08 28; 11(1):4330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. Inferring structural variant cancer cell fraction. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):730.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  35. Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):129-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  36. The somatic genomic landscape of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014 Sep 08; 26(3):319-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  37. Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers. Science. 2012 Aug 24; 337(6097):967-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.