Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
"Cone-Beam Computed Tomography" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Computed tomography modalities which use a cone or pyramid-shaped beam of radiation.
| Descriptor ID |
D054893
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E01.370.350.700.810.810.490 E01.370.350.825.810.810.399
|
| Concept/Terms |
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
- Computed Tomography, Cone-Beam
- Cone Beam Computed Tomography
- CT Scan, Cone-Beam
- CT Scan, Cone Beam
- CT Scans, Cone-Beam
- Cone-Beam CT Scan
- Cone-Beam CT Scans
- Scan, Cone-Beam CT
- Scans, Cone-Beam CT
- Tomography, Cone-Beam Computed
- Tomography, Cone Beam Computed
- Tomography, Volume Computed
- Computed Tomography, Volume
- Volume Computed Tomography
- Volumetric CT
- CT, Volumetric
- Volumetric Computed Tomography
- Computed Tomography, Volumetric
- Tomography, Volumetric Computed
- CAT Scan, Cone-Beam
- CAT Scan, Cone Beam
- CAT Scans, Cone-Beam
- Cone-Beam CAT Scan
- Cone-Beam CAT Scans
- Scan, Cone-Beam CAT
- Scans, Cone-Beam CAT
- Cone-Beam Computer-Assisted Tomography
- Computer-Assisted Tomography, Cone-Beam
- Cone Beam Computer Assisted Tomography
- Tomography, Cone-Beam Computer-Assisted
- Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography
- Computerized Tomography, Cone-Beam
- Cone Beam Computerized Tomography
- Tomography, Cone-Beam Computerized
- Cone-Beam CT
- CT, Cone-Beam
- Cone Beam CT
- Volume CT
- CT, Volume
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography" by people in this website by year, and whether "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2008 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2015 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography" by people in Profiles.
-
What Do We Know Beyond Reliability in Voxel-Based Registration? Validation of the Accuracy of Regional Voxel-Based Registration (R-VBR) Techniques for Orthognathic Surgery Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb; 80(2):296-302.
-
A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021 10 05; 7(6).
-
Radiation Dose during Transarterial Radioembolization: A Dosimetric Comparison of Cone-Beam CT and Angio-CT Technologies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 03; 32(3):429-438.
-
A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone-beam CT on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Dec; 21(12):146-154.
-
How Accurate Is 3-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Planning for Segmental Maxillary Surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep; 78(9):1597-1608.
-
Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100.
-
Collision-avoiding imaging trajectories for linac mounted cone-beam CT. J Xray Sci Technol. 2019; 27(1):1-16.
-
Management of Biliary Strictures: State-of-the-Art Review. Radiology. 2018 12; 289(3):590-603.
-
Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From a Prospective FDA-Approved Investigational Device Exemption Study. Urology. 2018 Oct; 120:205-210.
-
Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Outcomes Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Landmarks-The Case for Apples and Oranges? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug; 76(8):1746-1752.