Comparative Effectiveness Research
"Comparative Effectiveness Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Conduct and synthesis of systematic research comparing interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor health conditions. The purpose of this research is to inform patients, providers, and decision-makers, responding to their expressed needs, about which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. (hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/draftdefinition.html accessed 6/12/2009)
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Comparative Effectiveness Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
|Year||Major Topic||Minor Topic||Total|
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in Profiles.
Community Health Worker Asthma Interventions for Children: Results From a Clinically Integrated Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (2016?2019). Am J Public Health. 2021 07; 111(7):1328-1337.
Effects of 2 Forms of Practice Facilitation on Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care: A Practice-randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial. Med Care. 2020 04; 58(4):344-351.
The PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory: A Platform for Surveillance and Efficient Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 03; 13(3):e006115.
Effectiveness of Virtual vs In-Person Inhaler Education for Hospitalized Patients With Obstructive Lung Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 01 03; 3(1):e1918205.
The Kawasaki Disease Comparative Effectiveness (KIDCARE) trial: A phase III, randomized trial of second intravenous immunoglobulin versus infliximab for resistant Kawasaki disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 04; 79:98-103.
Leveraging Cumulative Network Meta-analysis and Value of Information Analysis to Understand the Evolving Value of Medical Research. Med Decis Making. 2019 02; 39(2):119-129.
Development and Validation of the Real-World Progression in Diabetes (RAPIDS) Model. Med Decis Making. 2019 02; 39(2):137-151.
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score. J Clin Oncol. 2019 02 01; 37(4):336-349.
Comparative effectiveness trials in asthma - how will I recognize one? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018 01; 24(1):78-82.
Enrolling African-American and Latino patients with asthma in comparative effectiveness research: Lessons learned from 8 patient-centered studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 12; 138(6):1600-1607.