The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Christopher Daugherty to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Christopher Daugherty has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.510
  1. Anxiety Shapes Expectations of Therapeutic Benefit in Phase I Trials for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Spousal Caregivers. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 02; 17(2):e101-e110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  2. A Qualitative Analysis of Oncology Patient Awareness of Medication Shortages and Their Preferences for How Shortages Should Be Managed. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 10; 16(10):e1098-e1111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  3. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Trainee Experiences During Medication Shortages. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Feb; 12(1):38-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  4. Mistaking the Trees for the Forest? Oncologist. 2020 04; 25(4):e743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  5. Prevalence and Severity of Rationing During Drug Shortages: A National Survey of Health System Pharmacists. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 05 01; 179(5):710-711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  6. Reply to J. Schildmann et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 01 10; 37(2):170-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  7. Do Patients With Advanced Cancer Have the Ability to Make Informed Decisions for Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials? J Clin Oncol. 2018 08 20; 36(24):2483-2491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  8. Investigator Disclosure and Advanced Cancer Patient Understanding of Informed Consent and Prognosis in Phase I Clinical Trials. J Oncol Pract. 2018 06; 14(6):e357-e367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  9. Psychological morbidities in adolescent and young adult blood cancer patients during curative-intent therapy and early survivorship. Cancer. 2016 Mar 15; 122(6):954-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. User beware: we need more science and less art when measuring financial toxicity in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20; 33(12):1414-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  11. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: The COST measure. Cancer. 2014 Oct 15; 120(20):3245-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Oncologists' and physiatrists' attitudes regarding rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer. PM R. 2012 Feb; 4(2):96-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  13. When parents disclose BRCA1/2 test results: their communication and perceptions of offspring response. Cancer. 2012 Jul 01; 118(13):3417-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  14. Parent opinions regarding the genetic testing of minors for BRCA1/2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20; 28(21):3498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. Physician preferences and knowledge gaps regarding the care of childhood cancer survivors: a mailed survey of pediatric oncologists. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10; 28(5):878-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  16. Learning of your parent's BRCA mutation during adolescence or early adulthood: a study of offspring experiences. Psychooncology. 2009 Feb; 18(2):200-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  17. What are terminally ill cancer patients told about their expected deaths? A study of cancer physicians' self-reports of prognosis disclosure. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 20; 26(36):5988-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  18. An international pilot study of oncology physicians' opinions and practices on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). Integr Cancer Ther. 2008 Jun; 7(2):70-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  19. Should genetic testing for BRCA1/2 be permitted for minors? Opinions of BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008 Feb 15; 148C(1):70-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. Ethical, scientific, and regulatory perspectives regarding the use of placebos in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10; 26(8):1371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  21. How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family's risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20; 25(24):3705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  22. Attitudes toward research participation and investigator conflicts of interest among advanced cancer patients participating in early phase clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10; 25(23):3488-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  23. Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10; 25(5):548-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  24. Are we taking without giving in return? The ethics of research-related biopsies and the benefits of clinical trial participation. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20; 24(30):4793-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. Use of the internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 01; 23(22):4954-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Trusting God and medicine: spirituality in advanced cancer patients volunteering for clinical trials of experimental agents. Psychooncology. 2005 Feb; 14(2):135-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. Ethical issues in phase I clinical trials. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004 Jun; 2(6):358-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Examining ethical dilemmas as obstacles to hospice and palliative care for advanced cancer patients. Cancer Invest. 2004; 22(1):123-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Clinical and molecular response of acute myeloid leukemia harboring non-canonical FLT3 N676K driver mutations to contemporary FLT3 inhibitors. Haematologica. 2023 08 01; 108(8):2234-2239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Associations among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping in patients with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trials. Support Care Cancer. 2003 Oct; 11(10):644-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  31. Overcoming obstacles to hospice care: an ethical examination of inertia and inaction. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 01; 21(9 Suppl):42s-45s.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. 'Hitting you over the head': oncologists' disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients. Bioethics. 2003 Apr; 17(2):142-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  33. American oncologists' views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 01; 21(5):942-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  34. The "cure" for cancer: can the media report the hope without the hype? J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 15; 20(18):3761-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  35. Utilization of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform to Evaluate the Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Experience Among a Community Sample of Ovarian Cancer Survivors. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 08; 6:e2200035.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  36. Overcoming obstacles to hospice care: an ethical examination of inertia and inaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 01; 20(11):2752-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  37. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncologist Burnout, Emotional Well-Being, and Moral Distress: Considerations for the Cancer Organization's Response for Readiness, Mitigation, and Resilience. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 07; 17(7):365-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  38. Referral and decision making among advanced cancer patients participating in Phase I trials at a single institution. J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12(1):31-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  39. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000 May-Jun; 22(3):6-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. Multisite, Randomized Trial of Early Integrated Palliative and Oncology Care in Patients with Advanced Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancer: Alliance A221303. J Palliat Med. 2020 07; 23(7):922-929.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  41. Informed consent, the cancer patient, and phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat Res. 2000; 102:77-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  42. Before Consent: Qualitative Analysis of Deliberations of Patients With Advanced Cancer About Early-Phase Clinical Trials. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 01; 16(1):e56-e63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  43. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective. J Clin Oncol. 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  44. Ethical issues in the development of new agents. Invest New Drugs. 1999; 17(2):145-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  45. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  46. Prognostic tumor sequencing panels frequently identify germ line variants associated with hereditary hematopoietic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2018 01 23; 2(2):146-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  47. Learning from our patients: one participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 01; 126(11):892-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  48. What advanced cancer patients with limited treatment options know about clinical research: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2017 10; 25(10):3235-3242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  49. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 02 01; 123(3):476-484.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. Hope and the limits of research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct; 26(5):20; discussion 20-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. Interest in initiating an early phase clinical trial: results of a longitudinal study of advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2017 Oct; 26(10):1604-1610.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  52. An Evaluation of Psychosocial and Religious Belief Differences in a Diverse Racial and Socioeconomic Urban Cancer Population. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 04; 4(2):140-148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  53. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  54. Pushing the envelope: informed consent in phase I trials. Ann Oncol. 1995 Apr; 6(4):321-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  55. Human subjects protection: an event monitoring committee for research studies of girls from breast cancer families. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Sep; 55(3):352-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  56. General internists' preferences and knowledge about the care of adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 07; 160(1):11-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  57. Family physician preferences and knowledge gaps regarding the care of adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep; 7(3):275-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  58. Physician preferences and knowledge regarding the care of childhood cancer survivors in Japan: a mailed survey of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Oncology. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun; 42(6):513-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  59. High dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone: an effective induction regimen for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leuk Lymphoma. 2012 Mar; 53(3):445-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  60. Standards for palliative care delivery in oncology settings. Cancer J. 2010 Sep-Oct; 16(5):436-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  61. Treatment of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms with high-dose cytarabine/mitoxantrone followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010 Jun; 51(6):995-1006.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  62. An intervention to improve cancer patients' understanding of early-phase clinical trials. IRB. 2009 May-Jun; 31(3):1-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  63. Outcomes of patients with AML and MDS who relapse or progress after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Dec; 40(11):1027-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  64. Housestaff and medical student attitudes toward medical errors and adverse events. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Aug; 33(8):493-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  65. Performance status and comorbidity predict transplant-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Sep; 12(9):954-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  66. Fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab conditioning in adults with standard-risk advanced acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20; 23(24):5728-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  67. A phase I trial of gemcitabine plus cladribine in patients with advanced hematologic malignant diseases. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004 Dec; 54(6):553-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  68. Psychosocial adjustment of patients and caregivers prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Jun; 27(11):1181-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  69. Preliminary experience with a new chemotherapy regimen for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001 Apr; 41(3-4):297-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  70. A dose escalation study of total body irradiation followed by high-dose etoposide and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Apr; 25(8):807-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  71. Transdermal testosterone administration in women with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome wasting: a pilot study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Aug; 83(8):2717-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  72. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Sep; 20(5):369-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  73. Prognostic factors for functional outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996 Jul; 51(4):M152-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  74. Physician-determined patient risk of toxic effects: impact on enrollment and decision making in phase I cancer trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Nov 16; 86(22):1685-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  75. Effect of X-irradiation dose rate on the clonagenic survival of human and experimental animal hematopoietic tumor cell lines: evidence for heterogeneity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986 Jan; 12(1):69-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.