 Peer Review
"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
| Descriptor ID |
D010380
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review- Peer Review
- Review, Peer
- Peer Reviews
- Reviews, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1986 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 1987 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2004 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2008 | 2 | 1 | 3 | | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 2016 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2017 | 0 | 2 | 2 | | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.
-
Wolf JM, Sandell LJ, Leopold SS, Dodson KL. Current State in Scientific Publishing: AOA Critical Issues Symposium. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Oct 02; 101(19):e101.
-
Doi K. Radiological Physics and Technology (RPT): Current Status and its Future. Igaku Butsuri. 2017; 37(1):38-46.
-
Doi K. [Radiological Physics and Technology (RPT): Current Status and Its Future]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2017; 73(12):1285-1293.
-
Cardenas CE, Mohamed ASR, Tao R, Wong AJR, Awan MJ, Kuruvila S, Aristophanous M, Gunn GB, Phan J, Beadle BM, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Morrison WH, Fuller CD, Rosenthal DI. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 07 01; 98(3):532-540.
-
Chung JH, MacMahon H, Montner SM, Liu L, Paushter DM, Chang PJ, Katzman GL. The Effect of an Electronic Peer-Review Auditing System on Faculty-Dictated Radiology Report Error Rates. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Oct; 13(10):1215-1218.
-
Rocha Mde S, Mendonça RA, Baron RL, Klein JS. Brazil, RSNA, and RadioGraphics. Radiographics. 2014 May-Jun; 34(3):743-7.
-
Matthews JB. 2013 SSAT presidential address: Peer review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan; 18(1):1-6.
-
Cohen E, Chen AY, Ferris RL, Lee A, Bernier J. Open Access in biomedical sciences: what the current turning point means more specifically to Oral Oncology contributors and readers. Oral Oncol. 2013 Oct; 49(10):985-6.
-
Song J, Li M, Hwang DH, Ricciotti RW, Chang A. The outcome of abstracts presented at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology annual meetings. Mod Pathol. 2010 May; 23(5):682-5.
-
Hyman NH, Osler T, Cataldo P, Burns EH, Shackford SR. Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: what does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality? J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan; 208(1):48-52.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|