"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
| Descriptor ID |
D010380
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review- Peer Review
- Review, Peer
- Peer Reviews
- Reviews, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2004 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2016 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.
-
Peer learning is both preferable and less expensive than score-based peer review: Initial experience at a tertiary academic center. Clin Imaging. 2024 Feb; 106:110065.
-
Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer-to-peer coaching. Med Educ. 2023 02; 57(2):118-120.
-
Attitudes and access to resources and strategies to improve quality of radiotherapy among US radiation oncologists: A mixed methods study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct; 66(7):993-1002.
-
Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 1: Breast/Chest, Face, and Voice). Ann Surg. 2022 01 01; 275(1):e52-e66.
-
Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction). Ann Surg. 2022 01 01; 275(1):e67-e74.
-
Peer Review and the Quest for Technical Excellence in Surgery-A Lesson in Self-awareness. JAMA Surg. 2021 02 01; 156(2):e205557.
-
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Infected Fluid Collections. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 May; 17(5S):S265-S280.
-
Current State in Scientific Publishing: AOA Critical Issues Symposium. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Oct 02; 101(19):e101.
-
Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 05 01; 137(5):552-556.
-
[Radiological Physics and Technology (RPT): Current Status and Its Future]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2017; 73(12):1285-1293.