"Peer Review, Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
| Descriptor ID |
D017712
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549.700 H01.770.644.487 I01.880.604.640.700 L01.143.865.750 L01.737.640 N03.706.700.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review, Research- Peer Review, Research
- Peer Reviews, Research
- Research Peer Review
- Research Peer Reviews
- Review, Research Peer
- Reviews, Research Peer
Peer Review, Grants- Peer Review, Grants
- Grants Peer Review
- Grants Peer Reviews
- Peer Reviews, Grants
- Review, Grants Peer
- Reviews, Grants Peer
- Grants, Peer Review
- Grant, Peer Review
- Peer Review Grant
- Peer Review Grants
- Review Grant, Peer
- Review Grants, Peer
Peer Review, Publishing- Peer Review, Publishing
- Peer Reviews, Publishing
- Publishing Peer Review
- Publishing Peer Reviews
- Review, Publishing Peer
- Reviews, Publishing Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review, Research".
- Psychiatry and Psychology [F]
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms [F01]
- Psychology, Social [F01.829]
- Group Processes [F01.829.316]
- Peer Review [F01.829.316.549]
- Peer Review, Research [F01.829.316.549.700]
- Natural Sciences [H]
- Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
- Science [H01.770]
- Research [H01.770.644]
- Peer Review, Research [H01.770.644.487]
- Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena [I]
- Social Sciences [I01]
- Sociology [I01.880]
- Social Control, Formal [I01.880.604]
- Peer Review [I01.880.604.640]
- Peer Review, Research [I01.880.604.640.700]
- Information Science [L]
- Information Science [L01]
- Communication [L01.143]
- Scholarly Communication [L01.143.865]
- Peer Review, Research [L01.143.865.750]
- Publishing [L01.737]
- Peer Review, Research [L01.737.640]
- Health Care [N]
- Health Care Economics and Organizations [N03]
- Social Control, Formal [N03.706]
- Peer Review [N03.706.700]
- Peer Review, Research [N03.706.700.700]
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review, Research".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review, Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2008 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2013 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2014 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in Profiles.
-
Use of Open Science Practices in Surgical Journals. JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 01; 159(2):228-229.
-
Double-blinded manuscript review: Avoiding peer review bias. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 07 01; 91(1):e39-e42.
-
What Every Reader Should Know About Studies Using Electronic Health Record Data but May Be Afraid to Ask. J Med Internet Res. 2021 03 02; 23(3):e22219.
-
Tips for authors of surgical manuscripts from senior reviewers. Surgery. 2021 07; 170(1):341-344.
-
Peer-assisted Learning: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Transition in Developing Countries. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 10; 29(10):689-695.
-
Raising the bar: the use of standardized reporting guidelines. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Oct; 39(10):1905-6.
-
Editorial: in praise of scientific review officers. Mol Endocrinol. 2014 Jul; 28(7):987-8.
-
An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge. Genome Biol. 2014 Mar 25; 15(3):R53.
-
Peer-reviewed publications in the era of social media--JHM 2.0. J Hosp Med. 2014 Apr; 9(4):269-70.
-
With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e85382.